While we fully condemn the actions of Belarus, we urge a response from the EU, the EU’s Member States, and all relevant European and international organisations that is in line with EU and international legal obligations and with standards of common decency.
While the people in the middle of the crisis are being used as parties in the conflict between the EU and Belarus which has a security dimension, the people themselves are not a security threat, and should neither be referred to nor be treated by either side as though they were a weapon. Indeed, all accounts suggest that there are many highly vulnerable groups among those caught up in these events, including pregnant women, families with young children and people who are elderly or injured. Among them are people who have fled war and persecution from Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan and Iraq, and who, in the absence of safe and legal pathways, had no alternative way to reach safety. We also note that despite the serious tensions that exist between the states involved, the situation, like many others at the EU’s borders, is manageable, and should be approached with a sense of perspective. Globally, many countries in very fragile situations face complex displacement challenges, with geo-political and security dimensions and involving far larger numbers of people. What is needed is a clear-headed response that includes a firm defence of the right to asylum, and of EU and international law.
We thus propose the following responses covering the various elements of the crisis:
Ensure access to asylum at the borders
Under EU and international law, everyone seeking asylum at the borders, irrespective of the manner of their arrival, has the right to make an asylum application. Access to asylum in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia should immediately be restored both in law and in practice. This means that all measures aimed at preventing people from accessing EU territory and from lodging an application for asylum, must cease. This includes preventing people from reaching the EU’s territory, including through the use of force and instructions to border guards to conduct push-backs, prohibiting their asylum applications from being lodged through limiting effective access to the procedure via geographical restrictions on where claims can be lodged, and attempting to derogate from asylum law and protection against refoulement.
Guarantee humanitarian access
In the short-term, it is essential that the states involved grant humanitarian access to the people affected so that humanitarian organisations can reach them and provide assistance. The fact that EU Member States prevent the delivery of life-saving assistance to people, some of whom are extremely vulnerable, is deplorable and reckless. It furthermore risks having negative implications for humanitarian access in displacement contexts outside the EU and undermines the EU’s role as a credible humanitarian actor.
Should the stand-off continue, the decision to immediately evacuate people from the border region into EU Member States, also by making use of the offers already received from civil society, cities and faith groups to welcome people is one option that could prevent further loss of life. In parallel, EU Member States should discuss and agree on ad-hoc relocation arrangements. Transporting people to third countries for asylum processing as has been proposed is unlawful under international and EU law, and politically unfeasible.
Withdraw non-compliant domestic legislation
The situation at the external border has led to changes to domestic asylum legislation. As legal analysis of the adopted legislation in Lithuania, Poland and Latvia demonstrates, some legislative changes are incompatible with the EU asylum acquis, the EU Treaties, the Charter for Fundamental Rights, and international law. In Lithuania, the changes aim to restrict access to asylum; remove protections for people in vulnerable situations; allow for automatic detention; restrict access to an effective legal remedy; and reduce access to reception conditions.
In the case of Poland, the new legislation is in direct violation of the principle of non-refoulement by allowing the removal of people from Poland even after they have applied for international protection and without an individual examination of whether the removal will lead to a violation of their human rights. In Latvia, the changes preclude the possibility of seeking asylum for persons crossing the border, meaning the right to seek asylum and protection against refoulement is not respected. While some of the amendments are – in theory – temporary and their application geographically restricted, they nevertheless risk institutionalising unlawful practice. Seeking asylum is a fundamental right and non-refoulement is a non-derogable principle that must be observed even in times of emergency.
The European Commission needs to follow through on its request to Member States to remove aspects of the legislation which violate EU law. Compliance with EU law should be a basic condition for all EU support. If Member States refuse to respect EU and international law, infringement and disciplinary measures must be considered.
Counteract repression of civil society, media and legal practitioners
The situation at the EU’s borders has provoked attempts by Member States to intimidate and repress independent civil society, media and legal practitioners seeking to respond in line with their professional functions. Activities aimed at providing humanitarian assistance and legal aid to people at the border must not be criminalised. Banning access to the border zones for civil society and journalists not only leaves people without support but also has repercussions for the work of independent civil society and media beyond Europe. It is essential that the situation in the border area is monitored by independent actors to ensure that EU and international law is respected. Acts of violence need to be condemned and investigated.
Place human rights standards and transparency at the heart of cooperation with third countries
Currently, the EU is proactively seeking agreements with third countries either to stop people from arriving at the EU’s border or to take back their nationals. It must be ensured that any agreement with third countries, such as Iraq, Turkey or Lebanon is in line with international human rights standards, starting with the right to leave one’s country and non-refoulement obligations. To enable democratic accountability over EU agreements with third countries, the content of any arrangements should be made publicly available, and the European Parliament should have a meaningful role in monitoring agreements. Independent monitoring and support to those returning should also be guaranteed.
The EU and its Member States must respond to the crisis at the border in accordance with their international and EU legal obligations. The current political and legal framework, if applied, provides all the elements for handling this situation in a rights based, calm and well managed manner. We are alarmed to hear of proposals being drafted that may allow for unjustifiable derogations from EU and international law.
A Buon Diritto Onlus
A.S.G.I. – Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione
ACT Alliance EU
Action Aid International
ARCI (Associazione Ricreativa e Culturale Italiana)
Association for Economic Consultations for Immigrants and Refugees (ACEIR)
Asylrättscentrum – Swedish Refugee Law Center
Brot für die Welt
Bundesverband Netzwerke von Migrantenorganisationen e.V. (NeMO) Germany
Church of Sweden
CIRÉ (Coordination et Initiatives pour Réfugiés et Étrangers)
Conselho Português para os Refugiados (CPR)
Danish Refugee Council (DRC)
Defence for Children – ECPAT Netherlands
Der Paritätische Gesamtverband
Dutch Council for Refugees
Estonian Refugee Council
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights
European Network on Statelessness
FARR – the Swedish Network of Refugee Support Groups
Fédération de l’entraide protestante
Federation of Protestant Churches in Italy (FCEI)
Finnish Ecumenical Council
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre
FOCSIV- Italian federation Christian organisations of international voluntary service
Forum for Equitable Development (Slovenia)
France terre d’asile
Geloof en Samenleving (de Remonstranten)
German Caritas Association
Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP) Europe
Greek Forum of Refugees
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
I.C.S. (Consorzio Italiano di Solidarietà)
ICMC Europe/SHARE network
IGLESIA EVANGELICA ESPAÑOLA
Immigrant Council of Ireland
Institue Emma – center for victims if violence
Institute Circle, Slovenia
International Rescue Committee
Irish Refugee Council
Ivorian Community of Greece
La Coordinadora de Organizaciones para el Desarrollo
Médecins du Monde International Network
Medici per i Diritti Umani (MEDU)
Missing Children Europe
Mosaico azioni per i rifugiati
New Women Connectors
Norwegian Refugee Council
Open Society European Policy Institute (OSEPI)
OPU – Organisation for Aid to Refugee
PIC – Legal centre for the protection of human rights and the environment
Red Acoge (Spain)
Refugees Welcome Italia
Safe Passage International
Save the Children
Slovene Philanthropy – Association for Promotion of Volunteering
Swiss Refugee Council
Symbiosis-School of Political Studies in Greece, Council of Europe Network
UNITED for Intercultural Action Campaign secretariat Fortress Europe No More Deaths
World Hazara Council (WHC)
Download statement (ENG)