Anticipatory action research, learnings, evaluations and assessments
Explore the collection below to discover how data, foresight, and community leadership are joining forces to redefine the future of global humanitarian response.
Executive summary
Document purpose
This report summarizes a Strategic Dialogue held in Nairobi on 8 May 2026, co-convened by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Danish Refugee Council. The event addressed the urgent need to develop anticipatory action systems capable of mitigating the impacts of fragility, conflict, and violence (FCV), which are escalating amid record displacement and shrinking humanitarian financing. The dialogue explored how to transition anticipatory action from a theoretical concept to a practical systems-change lever, emphasizing the importance of early intervention to reduce costs and protect communities.
Target audience
The primary audience includes:
- Senior humanitarian practitioners and policymakers
- Donor agencies and development partners
- Regional bodies such as IGAD and the EU
- Community-level actors and local organizations
- Academics and researchers focused on conflict and displacement
Key findings
The dialogue highlighted several critical insights:
- Evidence supports early action: Investments in anticipatory action ahead of conflict escalation have demonstrated significant cost savings, such as USD 1 invested saving USD 6.6 in emergency response in South Sudan.
- Community systems are underutilized: Local communities already anticipate displacement using informal early warning systems (e.g., livestock movement, market behavior), but these signals are not integrated into formal anticipatory frameworks.
- Structural gaps persist: Despite advancements in forecasting, institutional barriers—such as rigid financing, fragmented mandates, and limited flexibility—hinder the translation of early warnings into action.
- Diaspora networks are a missed opportunity: Diaspora groups play a crucial role in early warning and resilience but remain largely excluded from formal anticipatory systems.
- Systemic change is needed: Anticipatory action must be embedded within existing peacebuilding, development, and humanitarian architectures to maximize impact and sustainability.
The report concludes that the humanitarian sector must move beyond pilot projects and adopt a unified, systems-level approach to anticipatory action in FCV contexts.